Insights | White Papers
Domain Name Registration Data at the Crossroads
Internet users of all kinds rely on public domain name registration data services for accurate and up-to-date operational and registration information for vital and legitimate purposes, from business correspondence and technical problem solving with domain owners to victim notification following a security event, and for legal and social accountability as well. Historically, Internet users obtained these data by querying registration databases using WHOIS services. The many dependencies on WHOIS is obvious from the query volume of more than 66 billion per month.
ICANN oversees domain name registries and registrars that maintain and publish that registration data. Over the last two years, access to domain name registration data has been drastically curtailed as a result of ICANN policies, data privacy laws, and in no small part due to practices by registrars and registry operators. ICANN is also directing a migration to a new technical protocol, the registration data access protocol, RDAP, that may soon replace WHOIS access.
The report measures the effectiveness and impact of ICANN's registration data access policies and procedures by examining the practices of 23 registrars, which collectively sponsor more than two-thirds of the registrations in the generic top-level domains (gTLDs). This study determines whether they comply with ICANN's policies and related contractual obligations, and also to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).
The study attempted to answer five questions for each registrar:
The study found widespread problems: most notably,
Overall, there is a failure to provide the domain name registration data access, predictability, and reliability that ICANN exists to deliver, and registrars are obligated to provide.
For the past 15 years ICANN has tried, and failed, to deliver domain name data policies that balance legitimate needs, applicable legal obligations, and ICANN's Commitments and Core Values. The findings of this study clearly illustrate the extent to which the current regime is broken. ICANN and its community stand at a crossroads: can they develop and implement policies that meet the vital needs of the Internet?
The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this report are the product of independent work conducted by Interisle Consulting Group, without direction or other influence from any outside party, including parties that may have provided funding to support the work.